USPTO serial 79200422
GREEN HABIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5963761Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 21, 2020
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN HABIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Schloff
Jay Schloff Aidenbaum Schloff and Bloom PLLC6960 Orchard Lake RoadSuite 250West Bloomfield, MI 48322Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body creams; skin moisturizers; cosmetic nourishing creams; sun creams; non-medicated lip balms; skin cleansing creams; cleansing masks for the face; skin cleansing lotions; skin toners; sunscreen preparations; non-medicated after sun lotions; facial cleansers; beauty products, namely, cosmetic oils for the face and body, eye lotions, personal deodorants, body wash for humans, beauty balm creams and exfoliant creams; all of the foregoing made of natural environmentally friendly ingredients | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |