Drawing for CAVITATOR

USPTO serial 79200443

CAVITATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARESCA, MEREDITH Z
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAVITATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Cavitation devices; disintegrators for chemical processing; agitators for chemical processing; grinding machines; waste management and recycling machines; machines, namely, rammersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
040Treatment of materials; recycling and treatment of waste; gas processing servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 11, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 20, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 31, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 28, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 19, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance