USPTO serial 79200487
RCO BY CHEOPS THE BEST RED CLOUD IN THE WORLD!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RCO BY CHEOPS THE BEST RED CLOUD IN THE WORLD!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing and computer equipment; software (recorded programs); computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computer file management | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; telecommunication information; communications by computer terminals or by fiber-optic networks; connection by telecommunications to a global computer network; provision of access to computer resources via a telecommunication network, namely, cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Evaluations, assessments and research in the fields of science and technology provided by engineers; design and development of computers and software; research and development of new products for others; technical project studies; development (design), installation, maintenance, updating or rental of software; computer programming; consultancy relating to computers; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHEOPS TECHNOLOGY FRANCE, SA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RCO BY CHEOPS THE BEST RED CLOUD IN THE WORLD!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |