Drawing for CALLDESK

USPTO serial 79200527

CALLDESK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5440357Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2018
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CALLDESK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Mango

Thomas J. Mango Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Artificial intelligence software for use in the automated handling of vocal interactionsACTIVE—
042Scientific research in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; technical research services in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; software design in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; software development in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; research and development of new products for others in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; technical project study services, namely, conducting of feasibility studies in the field of new technologies in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; software development being design; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for using artificial intelligence technology in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; cloud computing, namely, cloud hosting provider services using artificial intelligence technology in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; information technology (IT) consultancy in the field of automated handling of vocal interactions; hosting of servers; electronic data storageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 16, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 9, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 5, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 19, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 19, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 19, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 23, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 19, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance