USPTO serial 79200634
VACHEROUSSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REID, CAILE MAUREEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VACHEROUSSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; jellies; jams; compotes; eggs; milk and dairy products, namely, milk beverages consisting principally of milk, chocolate milk, condensed milk; cheese and specialty cheese products in the nature of cheese spreads, cheese powders, cheese curds, cheese containing herbs, cheese containing spices, cheese containing fruits, cheese containing truffle; butter; cream being a dairy product; edible fats; yogurts; drinking yogurts; milk-based desserts, namely, ice cream shakes, milk-shakes; fruit mousses; vegetable mousses; chicken mousses, fish mousses, meat-based mousses mainly consisting of milk or dairy products; vanilla creams being dairy products, whipped creams, oeufs au lait, pana cotta, whipped creams; milk-based spreads; beverages mainly consisting of milk or dairy products, namely, milk beverages consisting principally of milk, chocolate milk, condensed milk; milk beverages, milk predominating; milk beverages containing fruit; unflavored and flavored fermented dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; food preparations and cooked dishes primarily consisting of the aforesaid goods; culinary specialties comprises of milk and dairy products, namely cheese, sour creams, thick cream, single cream, crème fraîche, low fat cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |