Drawing for CROSSFIRE

USPTO serial 79200666

CROSSFIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROSSFIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Staple

David W. Staple Casimir Jones, S.C.2275 Deming Way, Ste 310Middleton, WI 53562UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs and software to check the compatibility of computer programs with other software programs and computer hardware; computer programs and software to provide remote access to computer systems and personal electronic devices within a designated network with the aim of managing, monitoring and controlling of computer systems, software, and personal electronic devices; computer software for delivering and implementing software applications and data via computer networks; computer software for diagnosing and repairing software problems; computer software for scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating harmful and unauthorized data and programs on computer systems and personal electronic devices; computer software for collecting, analyzing and displaying information and data generated by software applications, servers, network devices, security devices, firewalls and remote infrastructure; computer software for collecting, analyzing and displaying information and data related to processes, records and network activity on a computer network; computer security software; software for managing computer security information and activity; computer software for identifying computer security threats and security risks; CAD/CAM software for designing hardware (computer chips and circuit boards); development tools for software; the aforementioned goods excluding control software for semiconductors, for switchboards in the nature of circuit boards and printed circuit boards (PCBs) and for graphics cardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 4, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 27, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 18, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 18, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 4, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 3, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance