USPTO serial 79200676
ATIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sensors and detectors, in particular for controlling lights or lighting installations; motion detectors, in particular passive infrared(PIR)-sensors; light sensors; combined PIR- and light sensors; light control installations; regulating and control devices and equipment for lighting installations; brightness regulation and control devices; software for lighting installations and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting installations, devices and equipment and lights; light modules and lights with light emitting diodes or discharge lamps as the means of lighting; sources of light containing light emitting diodes, not included in other classes; all aforesaid goods also with integrated sensors in form of motion detectors or light sensors or combinations thereof; lamp casings, grilles for directing light, reflectors and covers for lights, electric lamps, lamp sockets, suspension pendants for lights | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development, programming and implementation of software for planning of lighting installations and equipment; design and technical planning of installations for lighting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |