Drawing for ENDOSKIN

USPTO serial 79200789

ENDOSKIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5303940Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2017
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDOSKIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kisuk Lee

Kisuk Lee Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC7700 Bonhomme, Suite 400St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Make-up and cosmetics, cosmetic preparations for baths, cosmetics for the face and body, skin lotions, skin creams, non-medicated cosmetics for acne-prone skin, non-medicated cosmetics for atopic skin, toilet water, perfumes, hair care essences for cosmetic purposes, [ cosmetics kits comprising skin lotions, skin creams and toilet water, ] bases for flower perfumes, beauty masks, cosmetics in the form of patches, cakes of soap not for personal use, breath freshening strips, cosmetics for animals, essential oils for aromatherapy, essences for cosmetic useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 6, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 27, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 26, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 10, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 30, 2018COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 29, 2018LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 17, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 16, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance