Drawing for EPLAN SYNGINEER

USPTO serial 79200934

EPLAN SYNGINEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5532248Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2018
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPLAN SYNGINEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Smith

MATTHEW J SMITH POLSINELLI PC100 SOUTH 4TH ST STE 1000ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in computer-aided engineering and design automation and for use in machine and plant design in the fields of automation technology and computer-aided mechanical design construction projects; computer software for use in the individual modification of computer programs for special user requirements; computer hardware; data processing hardware; digital media, namely, prerecorded compact discs and DVD's and downloadable audio files featuring information on computer-aided engineering and design automation, machine and plant design in the field of automation technology, computer-aided mechanical design construction projects and individual modification of computer programs for special user requirementsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Conducting of training events for software usersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; scientific and technological services, namely, computer-aided design of computer hardware and software programs based on user specifications for mechanical design, construction, and automated manufacturing (CAD/CAM) applications; research and design in the field of computer-aided engineering of computer hardware and software programs based on user specifications for mechanical design, construction, and automated manufacturing (CAD/CAM) applications in the field of engineering and design automation, mechanical design construction projects; industrial analysis and research services in the field of design and development of computer hardware and software; engineering services; consultancy in the field of computer software; technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware systems; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; advisory services relating to computer hardware design; engineering consultancy services; engineering project studies, namely, engineering consulting; conducting engineering surveys; preparation of engineering reports, namely, engineering consultingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 16, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 21, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 21, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 1, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 7, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 20, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 4, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 4, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 26, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 26, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 22, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Mar 22, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 27, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 11, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance