USPTO serial 79201007
WALKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WALKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Encoded electronic chip cards for identifying particular users of computers and mobile telephones; downloadable ringtones for mobile telephones; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular telephones; downloadable graphics for mobile telephones; software used for transmitting photographs to mobile telephones; computer programs and software for image processing used for mobile telephones; software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network for use with online retail shopping and traveling; computer software for chatting with and collaborating with other users about vacation plans; computer software for mobile phones, namely, software for chatting, messaging and communication between users; computer software and messaging relating to ecommerce, mobile commerce, and online shopping; computer software for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; computer software for database management in the field of organizing e-commerce data and information; electronic tablets; graphics tablets; digital mobile telephones; mobile telephones with large keys and numbers for users with reduced vision or dexterity; mobile telephones with amplified features; smartphones; advanced mobile telephones with expanded functionality in the nature of smartphones; mobile telephones; pocket scales; electronic pocket calculators; pocket calculators; hand-held computers for note-taking; hand-held computers; hand-held personal computers; electronic pocket translators; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; calculating machines, data processors, computers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WALKEY AG
- Other trademarks owned by Patricia Zechner, MSc ETH - c/o TZC Group GmbH Impact Hub Zürich
- Other trademarks owned by WALKEY AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named WALKEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | PAPER RECEIVED AT TTAB | — | |
| Mar 15, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |