USPTO serial 79201125
NIKKEI NINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5352626Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2017
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIKKEI NINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
David A.W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 S. Meridian St.Indianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; hotel restaurant services; hospitality services, namely, providing food and drink; serving of alcoholic beverages; club services in the nature of restaurants and bars for the provision of food and drink; night club services featuring food; restaurant services provided by hotels; cocktail lounge services; bar services; providing food and drink in restaurants and bars | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 11, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |