USPTO serial 79201250
PRIVATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRIVATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Handbags; traveling bags; briefcases; leather briefcases; credit card holders of leather; wallets; leather document briefcases; leather key cases; purses; suitcases; cosmetic bags sold empty; sports bags; evening and shoulder bags for ladies; leather shopping bags; school bags; garment bags for travel; shoe bags for travel; beach bags; diaper bags; backpacks; Boston bags; traveling trunks; duffel bags; overnight bags; carry-on bags; satchels; opera bags; vanity cases sold empty; hides; cases and boxes made of leather; leather bags made for packaging; leather straps; umbrellas; leather leashes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Coats; jackets; trousers; skirts; tops; raincoats; overcoats; belts; braces for clothing; suits; stuff jackets; jumpers; jeans; cloaks; parkas; shirts; T-shirts; underwear; baby-dolls being nightwear; bathrobes; bathing costumes; négligée; swim suits; dressing gowns; shawls; scarves; ties; neckties; sweatshirts; undershirts; polo shirts; body suits; shorts; stockings; socks; shoes; bedroom slippers; overshoes; galoshes; clogs; soles for footwear; footwear upper; boots; ski boots; half boots; esparto shoes or sandals; sandals; bath sandals; gloves; mittens; hats and caps; visors being headwear articles; all of the foregoing specifically excluding apparel made of latex, rubber, and leather; all of the foregoing not sold through erotic retail stores, erotic mail order catalogs, or erotic internet sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |