Drawing for LYNX

USPTO serial 79201282

LYNX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5542910Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2018
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LYNX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Vana

James L. Vana Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400Seattle, WA 98101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Military vehicles for transport; Combat land vehicles, combat water vehicles, combat amphibious vehicles, combat air vehicles, armored vehicles, wheeled and chain military and combat land vehicles; structural parts for the aforesaid vehicles; land vehicles adapted for military purposes, water vehicles adapted for military purposes, air vehicles adapted for military purposesACTIVE—
013Tanks; armored turrets; machine gun turret shields; missile launcher turret shields; laser gun turret shields; decoy ejector turret shieldsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Nov 6, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 28, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 21, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 27, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 2, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2018LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 29, 2017RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 29, 2017RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2017RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Sep 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 30, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 19, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance