USPTO serial 79201373
BEEKEEPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5608974Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2018
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BEEKEEPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah L. Lively
Deborah L. Lively Pierson Ferdinand LLP711 S. Cedar Ridge Dr. #380308Duncanville, TX 75138United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for recording and playing back video and audio, namely, a software application that connects non-desk employees with each other throughout an organization and in any location for the purposes of communication and exchanging information | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, switching and providing advertising possibilities for others in the nature of switching and providing advertising space on home pages and on the Internet, * all for services that connect non-desk employees with each other throughout an organization and in any location for the purposes of communication and exchanging information; publishing advertisements on the Internet for services that connect non-desk employees with each other throughout an organization and in any location for the purposes of communication and exchanging information * | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, provision of access to data, programs and applications via the Internet, particularly for communication and interaction, not concerning and not in connection with beekeeping; telecommunications services, namely, provision of access to programs and application programs via the Internet, particularly application programs for communication and interaction, not concerning and not in connection with beekeeping | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific consulting in the field of Computer Science, not concerning and not in connection with beekeeping; technological consulting in the field of Cloud and Mobile Computing, not concerning and not in connection with beekeeping; scientific research and development, not concerning and not in connection with beekeeping; technological research and development in the fields of Software as a Service "SaaS" not concerning and not in connection with beekeeping; design of computers and computer programs, not concerning and not in connection with beekeeping | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beekeeper AG
- Other trademarks owned by Beekeeper AG
- Other trademarks owned by Beekeeper AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BEEKEEPER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |