USPTO serial 79201410
AERSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5409468Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2018
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AERSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
Deborah J. Peckham BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 High StreetBOSTON, MA 02110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanical control devices, namely, hydraulic and pneumatic controls for machines; mechanical controls for motors and machines; [ all of the foregoing in the wastewater treatment field; ] * all aforementioned goods with regard to the energetic optimization of industrial and water provision facilities * | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Software, for controlling machines, motors, and engines; computer hardware; electric and electronic controls and control devices for controlling machines, motors, and engines; software and hardware for electric and electronic controls and control devices for controlling machines, motors, and engines; master electric or electronic control systems, namely, electronic controllers for machines and engines; electric and electronic controls for the interconnected operation of blower and compressor units; electric and electronic controls for motors and machines [ ; all of the foregoing in the wastewater treatment field ] ; * all aforementioned goods with regard to the energetic optimization of industrial and water provision facilities * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aerzener Maschinenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Aerzener Maschinenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Aerzener Maschinenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AERSMART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 27, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 26, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |