USPTO serial 79201642
Serial No. 79201642
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5303950Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2017
- Examiner
- JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79201642?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
James A. Oliff Oliff PLCP. O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Japanese beef; beef tallow for food; milk; Japanese beef charcuterie; Japanese dried beef; Japanese beef ham; Japanese beef sausages; preparations for making Japanese beef curry stew; preparations for making Japanese beef stew; preparations for making Japanese beef soup; all of the aforementioned items made in whole or significant part using wagyu cattle | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |