USPTO serial 79201658
SARA ROKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SARA ROKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Bitetto
James J. Bitetto Tutunjian & Bitetto, P.C.401 Broadhollow Road, Suite 402Melville, NY 11747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Clutch bags; handbags; shoulder bags; Boston bags; beach bags; overnight bags; purses of precious metal; minaudiere bags in the nature of small clutch purses; evening bags for ladies; bags for carrying animals in the nature of animal carriers; leather leashes; leather shopping bags; pouches namely, key pouches, waist pouches, pouches of textile; travel garment covers in the nature of garment bags for travel; hip bags; tie cases for travel; shoe bags for travel; cases of leather or imitation leather; key cases of leather or imitation leather; pocket wallets; coin purses; briefcases for documents of leather and imitation of leather; cosmetic bags sold empty; school satchels; travelling trunks; briefcases of leather or imitation leather; vanity cases sold empty; credit card holders of leather and imitation of leather; card cases of leather and imitation of leather, namely, business card cases, credit card cases; business card cases; suitcases; rucksacks; valises; trunks; duffle bags; travelling bags; boxes of leather; carrying cases of leather; girths of leather; umbrellas; animal hides; cases of leather; none of the items and bags included in this class being for athletic or sports purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Coats; blousons; heavy jackets; parkas; cloaks; jackets; wind-resistant jackets; pelisses; raincoats; overcoats; trousers; shorts; skirts; tops; belts for clothing; straps for bras being parts of clothing; dresses; sweaters; jumpers; cardigans; pullovers; sweatshirts; jeans; gowns; shirts; undershirts, T-shirts; polo shirts; tailleurs; waistcoats; bermuda shorts; underwear; body shapers; babydolls being nightwear in the nature of baby doll pyjamas; bodies being underclothing; dressing gowns; negligees; chemises; nightgowns; pajamas; bath robes; bathing suits namely bikinis, one pieces and tankinis, all of these items not for training or competition; shawls; scarves; neckties; bow ties; tights; leggings; neckerchiefs; bandanas; braces for clothing as suspenders; gloves as clothing; mittens; stockings; socks; shoes; slippers; overshoes; rubber boots; wooden shoes; shoe soles; shoes uppers; boots; ankle boots; espadrilles; sandals; hats and berets; visors; none of the articles and clothing included in this class being for athletic or sports purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |