USPTO serial 79201852
B52
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REID, CAILE MAUREEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B52?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Whalley
Christopher J. Whalley Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | energy drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |