USPTO serial 79202250
TIET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Light-based apparatus for medical uses; light-based apparatus for the cosmetic treatment of the face, body, tissue and skin; light-emitting diodes - LED - for medical uses; lamps for medical uses; lasers for medical purposes; ultrasonic therapy apparatus; medical dermatoplastic instruments; medical laser skin care equipment; obesity therapy apparatus; liposuction apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |