USPTO serial 79202311
EPSILON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5718439Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2019
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EPSILON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik N. Lund
Erik N. Lund Whitestone Law PLLC8000 Westpark Drive. Suite 250Mclean, VA 22102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ computer software for diffractometric analysis of materials; ] computer software for spectrometric analysis of materials; computer software for x-ray fluorescence analysis of materials; computer software for determining X-ray intensities; computer software for determining the thickness of layer samples; computer software for determining chemical composition of materials; computer software for standardless analysis of samples; none of the aforesaid goods being for use in the field of psychological testing; [ X-ray detectors; X-ray imaging detectors; photon counting X-ray detectors; ] X-ray analytical apparatus; [ diffractometers; X-ray diffraction apparatus, X-ray diffractometers; ] X-ray analyzers; X-ray tubes; X-ray apparatus; [ computer software and hardware for X-ray diffraction and operating X-ray diffraction apparatus; ] spectrometers; component parts and fittings for all the aforesaid; none of the aforesaid goods being for medical purposes or for use in the field of psychological testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Feb 25, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | IRSS | IRREGULARITY RESPONSE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| May 3, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |