USPTO serial 79202575
LA GUILDE DU COGNAC SINGLE VILLAGE COGNAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA GUILDE DU COGNAC SINGLE VILLAGE COGNAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-16100 MERPINS, FR
F-16100 MERPINS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S LONDA Norris McLaughlin P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, online advertising on a computer network, dissemination of advertising material, organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; organization and conducting of trade fairs, events and exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; retail store and online store services for eaux-de-vie (brandy) with the protected appellation of origin "cognac "; demonstration and presentation services, namely, providing exhibitions of eaux-de-vie (brandy) with the protected appellation of origin "cognac", on any means of communication for retail sale or wholesale; commercial information and advice for consumers relating to eaux-de-vie (brandy) with the protected appellation of origin "cognac" | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Organization and conducting of educational colloquiums, conferences, congresses in the field of spirits, namely, cognac; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes in the field of spirits, namely, cognac | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |