USPTO serial 79202624
PH 8.88
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5366872Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2018
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PH 8.88?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harry S. Rosenthal
Harry S. Rosenthal Law Office of Harry S. Rosenthal768 N. Bethlehem PikeSuite 107Ambler, PA 19002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | [ Beers; ] mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, spring water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 13, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |