Drawing for INGENICS

USPTO serial 79202714

INGENICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5629916Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2018
Examiner
MAYER, DAVID COREY
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with INGENICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin M. Cantor

Benjamin M. Cantor Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultancy; Business strategy and planning consultancy services; Business strategy development; Business advisory services relating to data processing and data collection; Business consultancy and organization regarding the launching of new products; Providing information in the field of business; Conducting business feasibility studies; Compilation of statistics for business or commercial purposes; Conducting of business project studies for businesses; Economic forecasting analysis for business purposes; Data processing, namely, the professional business analysis of data; Compilation of data of third parties for business purposes; Economic consultancy regarding IT systems and IT processes; Cost-price analysis of IT systems and IT processesACTIVE—
042Technical consultancy in the field of information technology and digitalization; IT project management; Technical consultancy regarding IT systems and IT processes; Information technology engineering services and computer project management in the field of electronic data processing (EDP); Conducting of technical data analysis, namely, computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Computer systems analyses; Computer consultation, namely, technical analysis in the field of data processing technology; Computer systems analyses for others; Computer hardware consultancy, namely, consultancy in the development and design of computer hardware; Computer software consultancy servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 19, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 11, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 10, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 16, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 17, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 17, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 10, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2017ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2017LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Aug 17, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 1, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 14, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance