USPTO serial 79202926
KERATILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KERATILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Lee
Elizabeth Lee Lucas & Mercanti, LLP30 Broad Street21st FloorNew York, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely, tiles, parquet, paving blocks, borders, stoneware, all the foregoing for building and not of metal; rigid pipes, not of metal, for building; asphalt, pitch and bitumen; transportable buildings, not of metal; non-metallic monuments, alabaster; clay; sand, namely, building sand; art objects made of stone; concrete; tiles, not of metal, for building; terra-cotta floor tiles; lime building materials; limestone; materials for building and coating roads, namely, asphalt; potter's clay; plywood; quartz; tile floorings, not of metal; binders and binding agents for brickwork, namely, facing mortar; granite; sandstone for building; bricks; luminous paving blocks, not of metal; ceramic tiles and walls; wall linings not of metal for the construction of stoneware; stone; artificial stone; slate; slate powder; refractory construction materials, not of metal; wainscoting not of metal; non-metallic floors; marble; mosaics in the nature of tiles for building, not of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |