Drawing for BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE FOOD LOUNGE

USPTO serial 79202940

BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE FOOD LOUNGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5343413Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2017
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAND IDEA WHATEVER MAKES THE DIFFERENCE FOOD LOUNGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services relating to food; retailing of culinary specialties, namely, retail distributorships in the field of food, retailing by direct solicitation by sales agents in the field of food; electronic commerce services, namely, providing information about products via telecommunication networks for advertising and sales purposes; product demonstration and product display servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
043Serving food and drinks; bar services; cafeterias; canteens; catering for the provision of food and beverages; delicatessens; fast-food restaurants and snack-bars; self-service restaurant services; serving food and drinks in restaurants and barsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 31, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 9, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 14, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 14, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 28, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 10, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 22, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance