USPTO serial 79202975
AYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; software containing algorithms that control the power of blue light contained in the eyewear that is connected to the mobile phone; downloadable mobile application; downloadable mobile application containing algorithms that control the power of blue light contained in the eyewear; eyewear cases; eyewear; eyewear containing the blue light for treating various conditions of users, such as, jet lag, optimizing sleep patterns or boosting energy levels and mood enhancement; electronic devices; electronic devices in the form of eyewear that contains blue light which regulates hormone releases in the body and helps treating various conditions of users, such as, jet lag, optimizing sleep patterns or boosting energy levels and mood enhancement; batteries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |