USPTO serial 79202980
BONAVI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5293552Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2017
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BONAVI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VERA CHERNOBYLSKY
VERA CHERNOBYLSKY LAW OFFICES OF VERA CHERNOBYLSKY4623 DUNMAN AVENUEWOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Lacteal flour for babies; babies' diapers in the nature of napkins; babies' napkin-pants in the nature of diaper-pants; food for babies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Gruel, in the nature of a thin porridge consisting primarily of cooked oatmeal or some other whole grain, with a milk base, for food | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Novak Oleksii Mykolaiovych
- Other trademarks owned by Novak Oleksii Mykolaiovych
- Other trademarks owned by Novak Oleksii Mykolaiovych
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BONAVI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |