Drawing for EDISONS

USPTO serial 79202999

EDISONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EDISONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Chain saws; cement mixers (machines); lawn and garden tilling machines; powered garden trimmers; hedge trimmers (machines); power operated hedge trimmers; hammer drills; power hammers; power operated hammers; powered hammers; electric jacks; jacks (machines); lifting jacks (other than hand-operated); power operated jacks; electric lawnmowers; lawnmowers (machines); ride-on lawnmowers (machines); log splitters (machines); power-operated apparatus for the maintenance of lawns; lawn mowing attachments machines for vehicles; machines for use in the preparation of lawns; motor driven lawn mowers; power operated lawn edging tools; drill machines; electric drilling machines; electric welding machines; machines for use in grass cultivation; nailing machines; high pressure washers; electric saws; power saws; saw blades (parts of machines); saw blades for use with power tools; saw chains; saws (machines); shredders (machines); tillers (machines); tree pruners (machines); apparatus for electric welding; gas welding apparatus; gas welding machines; machines for welding (electric); machines for welding (gas); welding apparatus, electric; welding apparatus, gas-operated; welding current generators; welding machines, electric; electric winches; winches; welders, electric; plasma cutting machines; loading ramps; brush cutters (machines)ACTIVE—
035Retailing of goods (by any means)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance