USPTO serial 79203029
CHÂTEAU CALISSANNE FONT DE LEU H HUILE D'OLIVE VIERGE EXTRA HUILE D'OLIVE D'AIX EN PROVENCE AOP FRUITE VERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5337622Status 708Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2017
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CHÂTEAU CALISSANNE FONT DE LEU H HUILE D'OLIVE VIERGE EXTRA HUILE D'OLIVE D'AIX EN PROVENCE AOP FRUITE VERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOCIETE AGRICOLE DE LA DURANÇOLE
F-13680 Lançonde Provence, FR
SOCIETE AGRICOLE DE LA DURANÇOLE
F-13680 Lançonde Provence, FR
SOCIETE AGRICOLE DE LA DURANÇOLE
F-13680 Lançonde Provence, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron Y. Silverstein
Aaron Y. Silverstein Saunders & Silverstein LLP14 Cedar St, Suite 224Amesbury, MA 01913-1831UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits with the protected appellations of origin "Olives cassées de la Vallée des Baux-de-Provence" and "Olives noires de la Vallée des Baux-de-Provence"; preserved, dried and cooked vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and dairy products, namely, cheese, whipping cream and butter; ] olive oils for food, with the protected appellation of origin "huile d'olive d'Aix-en-Provence", [ dairy products, namely, sour cream; ] olive oils for food | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | [ Wines with the protected appellation of origin "Coteaux d'Aix-en-Provence"; eaux-de-vie brandy with one of the protected geographical indications "Eaux-de-vie de vin originaire de Provence" and "Marc de Provence ou eaux-de-vie de Marc de Provence ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ Advertising services; business management assistance; presentation of goods on all media, namely, advertising the goods of others; wholesale and retail store, and online retail store featuring food and wine; online retail store services, retail store services in stores, mail order services, catalog ordering services and distribution services in the nature of a wholesale distributorship, all of the aforementioned featuring wines and spirits, foodstuffs, clothing, household linen, tableware, cutlery and glassware; presentation of goods on all communication media, for retail sale, namely, providing television home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise; administration of business and shops online for retail sale, namely, retail shops featuring food and wine; sales promotion for others ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE AGRICOLE DE LA DURANÇOLE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE AGRICOLE DE LA DURANÇOLE
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE AGRICOLE DE LA DURANÇOLE
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CHÂTEAU CALISSANNE FONT DE LEU H HUILE D'OLIVE VIERGE EXTRA HUILE D'OLIVE D'AIX EN PROVENCE AOP FRUITE VERT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 6, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |