Drawing for BEAUGANIC

USPTO serial 79203117

BEAUGANIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5319567Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 31, 2017
Examiner
MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAUGANIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yoon S. Ham

Yoon S. Ham HAUPTMAN HAM, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin care products, namely, cosmetic skin fresheners, skin moisturizers used as cosmetics, skin masks, skin bronzer; eye cream; cream for whitening the skin; cosmetic nourishing creams; astringents for cosmetic purposes; moisture creams; beauty serums; anti-wrinkle creams; wrinkle care creams, namely, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, wrinkle-minimizing cosmetic preparations for topical facial use; beauty masks; anti-aging serums for cosmetic purposes; skin toners for cosmetic use; beauty soap; cosmetics; body lotion; perfume; skin whitening cosmetic preparations; beauty blemish-reducing balm creams; sunscreen cream; cosmetic creams for skin careSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 7, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 18, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 17, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 31, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 31, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 18, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance