Drawing for SONNENMOOR

USPTO serial 79203146

SONNENMOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONNENMOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 16, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 15, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2018MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2018PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 10, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 21, 2017PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 13, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 20, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 18, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—
Jan 16, 2017PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance