USPTO serial 79203192
OMNICOMM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMNICOMM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus for transferring data over telecom networks; detectors for telematics including fuel level sensors; navigational apparatus; high-frequency apparatus for transferring data in cellular networks (GSM); counters, meters; indicators for quantity and fluid level; measuring apparatus for telematics purposes; gauges including fuel level sensors; satellite navigational apparatus for GPS/GLONASS networks transferring data to telematics system; electrical monitoring apparatus for telematics purposes; temperature indicators, preferably for measuring temperature from different parts of vehicle and transfering to telematics software; precision measuring apparatus for various liquids (including fuel) level measurement; computer operating programs (recorded) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data conversion of computer programs and data, including conversion electrical signals into digital data not physical conversion; computer programming including for web based reporting software and databases, including for purposes of integration with 3rd party software and firmware; monitoring and control of computer systems and firmware based devices by remote and direct access; computer software design including for purposes of integration with 3rd party software; electronic data storage on local devices and remote servers; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; cloud computing, software as a service (SaaS); telecommunications technology consultancy; computer software consultancy; IT consultancy, including for purposes of integration with 3rd party software; technological consultancy, including in the field of telematics; rental of web servers, including for transport monitoring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 26, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |