USPTO serial 79203380
NANOFIXIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANOFIXIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin P. Hoffman
Martin P. Hoffman STEIN IP LLC1990 M STREET NWSUITE 610WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | liquid display screen protectors made of titanium and titanium oxide used for forming a protective layer on the screens of monitors, TV sets, displays of electronic equipment, tactile screens of electronic tablets, mobile phones; spectacles and glasses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 25, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |