USPTO serial 79203387
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Rubber, gutta-percha, gum and goods made thereof not included in the other classes, namely, pressed and vulcanised rubber goods for industrial purposes, rubber profiles, profile pieces, sealing rings, profile cords, bottle washers, stopper washers, hoses washers not of metal, hoses not of metal; mould parts, of plastic, for industrial purposes (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); elastomers (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); spacers in the form of hose/circular self locking rings made of gum and elastomers (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |