USPTO serial 79203625
Serial No. 79203625
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5876137Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2019
- Examiner
- MORAN, CAROLINE L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79203625?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
NANCY DWYER CHAPMAN LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPONE CHASE RD LACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; processed wheat; pounded wheat; wheat germ for human consumption; flaked wheat; wheat flour; whole wheat grains being preserved; unsorted wheat flour; whole wheat grain being dried; brown sugar; processed corn; corn flour; rice; spices; non-dairy ice cream; farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; herbal infusions; processed herbs; gluten-free bread | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring food; electronic commerce services, namely, providing information about products via telecommunication networks for advertising and sales purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |