Drawing for PQE

USPTO serial 79203669

PQE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5415062Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2018
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PQE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Alexander Nolte

N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101Scarsdale, NY 10583United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management advice; Consultancy services regarding business strategies; Business consultancy services relating to the supply of quality management systems; Business consulting; Corporate business management consultancy; Business organisation advice; Business efficiency advice; Personnel management consulting; Business administration servicesACTIVE—
042Technological consultancy in the technology fields of computer hardware systems and software engineering; Consultancy in the field of computers; Advisory services in the field of product development and quality improvement of software; Computer software consultancy; Engineering consultancy relating to product testing; Engineering consultancy relating to new product design; Engineering consultancy relating to automated manufacturing; Technical advice relating to security, namely, computer security consultancy, data integrity security consultancy; Enterprise content management, namely, data warehousing and electronic storage of files and documents; Testing of pharmaceuticals; Pharmaceutical research and development; Information technology services for the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries, namely, information technology consulting services and planning, design and management of information technology systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 8, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 7, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 6, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2017ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2017CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 18, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 18, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 30, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 24, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance