Drawing for GENIC GENUINE COSMETOLOGY PARTNER

USPTO serial 79203694

GENIC GENUINE COSMETOLOGY PARTNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GENIC GENUINE COSMETOLOGY PARTNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

1700 DIAGONAL ROADSUITE 505ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; body and beauty care cosmetics; cosmetic preparations for skin care; hair colorants; cosmetic preparations for the face and body; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; perfumes; hair conditioners; cosmetic facial masks; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; pre-moistened cosmetic tissues; soaps, not for personal use, namely, detergent soaps; cleaning preparations; cosmetic soap; shampoos; hand cleaners; dentifrices; oils for perfumes and scentsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 23, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 23, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 23, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 10, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 25, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 13, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jul 26, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 29, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance