USPTO serial 79203770
BV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. MURTAUGH
JOHN P MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 EAST 9TH STREET SUITE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear; shoes; slippers; sandals; half-boots; boots; inner soles; trouser straps; clothing, namely, pullovers, cardigans, sweaters, trousers, skirts, jackets, blouses, shirts, jeans, sweatpants, shorts, sweatshirts, suits, dresses, overcoats, coats, raincoats, belts, jerseys, neckwear, scarves, neckties, socks and stockings, tights, gym suits, t-shirts, underwear, bath robes, beachwear, headwear, hats and caps, gloves; belts for clothing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |