Drawing for DUPLEX CONCEPT

USPTO serial 79203849

DUPLEX CONCEPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5393381Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 6, 2018
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUPLEX CONCEPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth A. Cominolli

Elizabeth A. Cominolli Barclay Damon LLP125 East Jefferson StreetSyracuse, NY 13202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Tablets supplying machines; rotary tablet presses; rotary presses for pellet production; hydraulic presses for pellet production; tableting tools as machine parts for pellet production; die table segments for rotary presses; stamping moulds for tableting presses as machine parts, deburring and dedusting machines; press chamber coating installations for industrial manufacturing; filtering machines; sorting machines for industry, namely, for pellets; replacement parts for all the aforesaid goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Material testing instruments and machines; metal testing equipment; electric and electronic apparatus and instruments for controlling, monitoring and control of machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of machines and machine toolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Process engineering or engineering; developing machines and machine tools; design and development of computer hardware and software, all for controlling and operating machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 31, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 23, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 11, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 6, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 6, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 1, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 31, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance