USPTO serial 79203852
PLOTLOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLOTLOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for processing of hyperspectral and geo-spatial data; decision support systems applying processed hyperspectral and geo-spatial data; packaged software for controlling hyperspectral and geo-spatial field equipment (e.g. lidar and gps systems); access to processed data over the internet or from a desktop computer for decision support; interfacing with other software for automated scheduling and process optimisation; computer hardware; downloadable computer programs for presentation and interpretation of hyperspectral and geo-spatial data; apparatus for use in audio-visual communication, namely, applications that can be used by smart phones, laptop computers, desktop computers, tablet computers; global positioning system (GPS) apparatus; electronic plotting apparatus; computer training manuals recorded on computer media; training manuals on hyperspectral and geo-spatial systems in electronic format; electronic publications, namely, website copy and user manuals featuring hyperspectral and geo-spatial systems; mining, agribusiness and commodity information recorded on computer media; pre-recorded compact discs featuring hyperspectral and geo-spatial systems; pre-recorded DVDs featuring hyperspectral and geo-spatial systems; none of the foregoing being in connection with literature or screen writing | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building construction services; electrical systems installation services; repair, maintenance and installation advisory services in the field of computer hardware for mining and agribusiness; information technology services, namely, computer and computer peripherals installation and maintenance services; installation of computerised information systems; maintenance, installation and repair of electrical items and equipment; repair, maintenance and installation consultancy services in the field of computer hardware, mining and agribusiness; maintenance and repair of electronic installations in the field of computer hardware, mining and agribusiness; installation of communications network apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; web site design; design of computer software; development of computer software; Design for others in the field of computer networks, software, and engineering for mining and agribusiness; computer engineering project management services; online provision of web-based non-downloadable software for use in the industries of mining and agribusiness and for the purposes of interpreting and transferring hyperspectral and geo-spatial data; technical inspection services of computer software and computer hardware; information services relating to information technology; scientific advisory services in the field of hyperspectral and geo-spatial systems; design of computer hardware; advisory services relating to computer hardware design; data mining services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |