Drawing for DIABETEC

USPTO serial 79204099

DIABETEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIABETEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for food; artificial sweeteners; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of food; chemical preparations for use in the food industry; vitamin preparations for use as additives to food for human consumptionACTIVE—
005Nutritional supplements, artificial sweeteners adapted for medical purposes; health food supplements made principally of minerals or vitamins; health food supplements for persons with special dietary requirements; food supplements for medical purposes; supplements (trace element) for foodstuffs for human consumptionACTIVE—
029Dairy products; dairy-based beverages; beverages consisting principally of milk; desserts made wholly or principally of dairy products; potato chips; potato based snack food products; prepared snacks made principally from fruit; prepared snacks made principally from vegetables, prepared snacks made principally from nuts; snack foods consisting principally of meat; snack foods made principally from eggsACTIVE—
030Bakery products; preparations for making bakery products; bread; cakes; cookies; pastry; rice, noodles, pasta; natural sweeteners; ice cream; confectionery; popcorn; cereal-based snack food; flour based savoury snacks; rice-based snack food; wheat-based snack food; coffee-based beverages; tea-based beverages; cocoa-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; coffee; tea; cocoa; artificial coffee; edible icesACTIVE—
032Mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic beverages; soda pops; soft drinks; fruit beverages and fruit juices; smoothies fruit beverages, fruit predominating; vegetable juices beverages; soya-based beverages, other than milk substitutes; syrups and other preparations for making beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 7, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 31, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance