USPTO serial 79204153
HIROKYU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5488656Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2018
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HIROKYU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. David Starr
H. David Starr MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | [ Fishing tackle; ] Artificial fishing bait in the nature of scent lures, namely, groundbait made primarily from processed krill, sardines, shrimp or pupa | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | [ Live fishing bait; ] natural fishing bait in the nature of fish food, namely, processed fishing bait made primarily from krill, freshwater fish, shrimp, squid, sardines, clams, whitefish, breadcrumbs or wheat flour; packaged freeze-dried fishing bait [ ; animal foodstuffs; foodstuffs for fish ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HIROMATSU KYU FISHERY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HIROMATSU KYU FISHERY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HIROMATSU KYU FISHERY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named HIROKYU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 9, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |