Drawing for COLBI*DYNAMICS

USPTO serial 79204411

COLBI*DYNAMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NITKIN, DINISHA F
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COLBI*DYNAMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit

JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON STREETSUITE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for processing and analyzing business transactions, structured or unstructured, from multiple data sources and assessing their risk; graphical user interface softwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2019IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Oct 15, 2019IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 23, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 21, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 21, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 21, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 4, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 21, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 13, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 7, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance