USPTO serial 79204425
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras photography; telescopes; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; lightning arresters; computer peripheral devices; time clocks time recording devices; camcorders; surveying apparatus and instruments; theft prevention installations, electric; batteries, electric | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |