USPTO serial 79204428
ISUZU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISUZU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Rings of rubber; stuffing rings; water-tight rings; rubber stoppers; pipe gaskets; seals; washers of rubber or vulcanized fiber fibre; rubber, raw or semi-worked; ebonite vulcanite; plastic substances, semi-processed | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |