Drawing for ÇOLAKOGLU

USPTO serial 79204514

ÇOLAKOGLU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5398579Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 13, 2018
Examiner
LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ÇOLAKOGLU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

P. Jay Hines

P. Jay Hines MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.121 S. Royal st.Alexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006steel rebar; steel billet; steel slab; hot rolled steel coils; hot rolled steel sheets; hot rolled steel coils/sheets with either a chequered or a tear-drop-shaped surface pattern; carbon steels; iron and steel; steel; steel in sheet, rod, bar and/or billet form; steel in the form of slab, sheets, plates, foils and coils; steel plates and sheets; steel rebars, rods, and mesh used for strengthening and reinforcing concrete structures; steel sheets; steel strip; steel in the form of sheets, plates, foils and reels; tile flooring of metal; hot rolled steel in the form of sheets and coils, hot rolled steel, pickled and oiled in the forms of sheets and coils; goods and materials of common metal for sheltering, preserving, storage, wrapping, protecting, packaging, and construction purposes, namely, packaging trays and boxesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 11, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2023NURCNOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED—
Apr 17, 2023COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Apr 11, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2022ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 13, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 8, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 18, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance