USPTO serial 79204693
CLEMENT DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEMENT DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
Mark Lebow Ladas & Parry1700 Diagonal RoadSuite 505Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Headgear, namely, headwear, hats and caps; footwear; overalls; aprons; long aprons; work clothes, namely, shirts, dresses, pants, trousers, jackets, coats, waistcoats, tee-shirts, polo shirts, skirts, polo-skirts, and aprons; professional clothing, namely, tops and bottoms; professional clothing particularly for the medical other than clothing especially for operating rooms and laboratories, paramedical, beauty, restaurant, hotel and food sectors, namely, tops and bottoms; headgear for professionals, namely, headwear, hats and caps for professionals; headgear for professionals particularly for the medical, paramedical, beauty, restaurant, hotel and food sectors, namely, sectors, namely, headwear, hats and caps; work shoes; work footwear particularly for the medical, paramedical, beauty, restaurant, hotel and food sectors; clogs for cooks; belts for cooks; all of the foregoing goods not for the field of sporting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |