USPTO serial 79204787
AKER ACCURATE KINETIC ENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5483066Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2018
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AKER ACCURATE KINETIC ENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ran He
10611 Harwin Dr. Suite 406Houston, TX 77036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Silicon crystal wafers; quartz oscillator; filters, namely, telecommunication signal processors for filtering signals; voltage controlled oscillator; temperature compensation voltage controlled oscillator; surface acoustic wave filter, namely, surface acoustic wave sensors, electronic magnetostrictive equipment in the nature of a wave analyzer for filtering surface acoustic waves, telecommunications equipment in the nature of wave division multiplexers; integrated circuit; electronic component, namely, oscillator; electronic component, namely, temperature-compensated oscillator; electronic component, namely, surface acoustic wave sensors; electronic component, namely, surface acoustic wave resonator; electronic component, namely, thermostatic controlled oscillator; electronic component, namely, order oscillator | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AKER TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by AKER TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by AKER TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AKER ACCURATE KINETIC ENERGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |