Drawing for BRÜGGEMANN

USPTO serial 79204835

BRÜGGEMANN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5348319Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2017
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BRÜGGEMANN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa E. Scott

Melissa E. Scott Fox Rothschild LLP212 Carnegie Center Drive, Suite 400Princeton, NJ 08540United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical reducing agents, namely, reducing agents for use in emulsion polymerization, textile industry, personal care; plastic additives, namely, additives for polyamides, polyesters and others like stabilizers, processing auxiliaries, modifiers and additives for cast polyamideACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 26, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2024EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 7, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 27, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 19, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 5, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2017AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 15, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 14, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance