USPTO serial 79204887
LIQUIDSTRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DYER, ERIN ZASKODA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIQUIDSTRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. May
David L. May Nixon Peabody LLP799 9th Street, NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and apparatus for use in separating solids and/or contaminants from liquid; filtration machines and apparatus in the nature of machines used for process filtration of wastewater; filters, namely, effluent filters, in the nature of separators (machines) for use in separating solids from liquids; valves being (parts of machines); material handling and conveying machines in the nature of machines that separate and convey solids; heat exchangers being (parts of machines); centrifuges; replacement parts and accessories for the aforementioned goods related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Installations and equipment for water supply and sanitary systems in the nature of pressure regulators for water and sanitary installations; apparatus and installations for the treatment of water, namely, electrostatic water treatment apparatus and installations; apparatus, namely, metal cylindrical chamber and screen for use in filtering and the removal of suspended solids from a liquid; installations, namely separators for the separation, cleaning and purification of liquids; apparatus and installations, namely, thickening and dewatering machines for use in the treatment and management of water, sewage, waste water and effluents; apparatus and installations namely, drainage water treatment tanks, sewage treatment and purification installations and waste and waste water purification unites for the catchment, drainage, storage, reticulation, distribution and disposal of wastewater, effluent and waste; purification installations for water, effluent, sewage and wastewater; filtering installations in the nature of water purification installations and also consisting of their parts, namely, integrated risers, lids, basins, adapters, pumps and pump systems; treatment installations namely reverse osmosis filtration units to separate water from contaminants; contaminants replacement parts and accessories for the aforementioned goods related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Services for the treatment of water, waste water, sewage, effluent and waste; treatment of waste and effluent; environmental remediation services in the nature of purification and decontamination of water, air and soil; services for the treatment of effluent wastewater used in irrigation; recycling and sorting of waste; processing services in the nature of the treatment of water, soil, sewage, sludge, effluent and waste products; services for the treatment of water, sewage, waste and effluent provided by wastewater treatment plant; consultancy, advisory and information services relating to the foregoing services related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |